Talk:Colorado

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Colorado article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

• Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
• New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

• Assume good faith
• Be polite and avoid personal attacks
• Be welcoming to newcomers
• Seek dispute resolution if needed

Article policies

• Neutral point of view
• No original research
• Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWLArchives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days 

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:United States: Colorado / History Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to improve, create, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the New section tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as Mid-importance).

Geography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Geography To-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles. Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes Map : See Wikipedia requested maps Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places Stubs : See Geography stubs

Mining Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cannabis Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skiing and Snowboarding Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of skiing and snowboarding articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Travel and Tourism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Section sizes

Section size for Colorado (65 sections) Section name Byte count Section total (Top) 11,424 11,424 History 8,668 30,336 Territory act 5,863 5,863 Statehood 3,643 3,643 Twentieth and twenty-first centuries 12,162 12,162 Geography 3,095 15,199 Plains 2,303 2,303 Front Range 919 919 Mountains 3,135 4,433 Continental Divide 1,298 1,298 South Central region 812 812 Western Slope 3,637 3,637 Climate 852 23,541 Eastern Plains 3,350 3,350 Front Range foothills 909 909 Extreme weather 5,636 5,636 Climate change 78 78 Records 9,558 9,558 Extreme temperatures 954 954 Earthquakes 2,204 2,204 Fauna 8,857 8,857 Counties 5,760 19,674 Municipalities 7,556 7,556 Unincorporated communities 2,909 2,909 Special districts 3,449 3,449 Statistical areas 1,894 1,894 Demographics 12,613 26,668 Birth data 8,076 8,076 Language 637 637 Religion 5,342 5,342 Health 1,326 3,730 Obesity 1,213 1,213 Life expectancy 489 489 Homelessness 702 702 Economy 9,844 13,672 Agriculture 696 696 Natural resources 2,584 2,584 Electricity generation 548 548 Culture 94 17,196 Arts and film 3,831 3,831 Cuisine 2,632 2,632 Wine and beer 3,821 3,821 Marijuana and hemp 2,336 6,818 Medicinal use 3,370 3,370 Recreational use 1,112 1,112 Transportation 4,978 4,978 Education 5,560 5,560 Government 48 14,758 State government 3,093 14,710 Politics 6,052 6,052 Significant initiatives and legislation enacted in Colorado 5,565 5,565 Indigenous People 684 684 Military installations 1,875 1,875 Protected areas 1,791 1,791 Sports 2,132 7,866 Professional sports teams 2,240 2,240 College athletics 3,494 3,494 See also 282 282 Footnotes 28 28 References 28 28 Further reading 1,482 1,482 External links 54 3,010 State government 330 330 Federal government 914 914 Other 1,712 1,712 Total 214,533 214,533

Article issues

This article is assessed as B-class. Part of the criteria is: The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. There are several unsourced sub-sections that surely should be referenced since they go beyond "the sky is blue". Otr500 (talk) 23:32, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Not anymore. Wow (talk) 01:23, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Shouldn't abortion be mentioned?

Is any of this actually WP: Undue?

While abortion law may not merit mention pre-Dobbs, it seems obvious to me that abortion law now merits mention in state's articles. KlayCax (talk) 23:15, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

@KlayCax: Colorado's abortion law history has already long been in the article. It is not a crucial aspect of the state. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:20, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for responding, @Pbritti:. I'm aware that there was a general agreement to generally not include mention of abortion (particularly in leads) pre-Dobbs. However, that agreement was reached in circumstances far different than today. I want to note that I don't think abortion should be mentioned in every article. But Colorado legalizing abortion at every stage of pregnancy is notable (and not typical of the U.S.) — and has been been frequently mentioned in profiles of the state.

I would only mention abortion in around 10-15% of present state articles. (Those with near-total bans and legal at every stage of pregnancy) That doesn't seem undue to me. KlayCax (talk) 23:26, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

You're unilaterally changing consensus without consulting subject-matter experts on multiple state articles. Colorado is notable for a wide variety of reasons that don't bear mention in the lead. Many of these articles such as Colorado's, already mentioned their exceptional legal practices regarding abortion (going both ways) but you've added whole independent sections on the subject. You acted boldly, but these edits need to stop until you have a consensus to support this change in standard. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:45, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

What do you think of this?

• State's laws on abortion are mentioned in every article's body.
• Abortion law is only mentioned in the lead of a state's article if:
  • 1.) It is legal at all stages of pregnancy (Colorado, Alaska, New Mexico, New Jeresy, Vermont)
  • 2.) There are near-total bans with no exceptions for rape, incest, et al. (Wisconsin, South Dakota, several other states in Deep South.)
  • 3.) Precendent setting (Idaho's "abortion trafficking" bill, Texas's Heartbeat Act, et al.)

I think guidelines similar to this would be an improvement on the status quo. Mentions of abortion would still be limited to a small minority of states; with Dobbs overturned, it seems to me WP: Due. KlayCax (talk) 00:07, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

You probably need to get consensus from each individual state's regular editors or from a community like WikiProject United States. Of these, perhaps only Texas bears mention in an encyclopedic lead. For what it's worth, these sorts of things are also covered far better and with the gravity they are due in other articles not exclusively on abortion (for example, List of Colorado ballot measures). These broad-stroke edits to relatively stable pages need far more nuance than has been exhibited. ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:12, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

• Would you personally be okay with it being mentioned in Colorado's article's lead?
• Would a RFC be appropriate here? If so, I'm not sure where to exactly have it. This article? I'm not typically involved with Wikiprojects. I'll definitely ask, though. Thanks. KlayCax (talk) 00:17, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Yeah, an RFC is probably a good idea (on all of these). I highly doubt you're the only one who feels the way you do (I feel pretty strongly that, save for Texas, these mentions are undue). I think a single RFC at WikiProject US with notices on the relevant state articles and perhaps invitations to other WikiProjects is the way to go (I can help ensure cast a suitably wide and even net). ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:25, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Creating one now, @Pbritti:. KlayCax (talk) 00:52, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Colorado River and the state's name

The state of Colorado is not named for the Colorado River. While this seems like a simple enough explanation of the state's name–similar region, same meaning, same people doing the naming, etc.–the origins of the state's name are not usually described in modern reliable sources beyond that it is the Spanish word for "red" and "ruddy" (see Britannica and Colorado Encyclopedia). Two years ago, I asked History Colorado this question in order to put the matter to bed. Most of the 26 August 2021 response from Sam Bock, then a public historian and exhibit developer at History Colorado, is provided below (I've removed the polite greeting and send off from the email):

From what I understand, you are correct that the state's name did not come from the river, which was known as the Grand River until after Colorado was named.

I'm not sure that History Colorado has any documentation for this account, but I've always understood that the founders of Colorado Springs (previously called Colorado City) sent two lobbyists to Washington DC in the years leading up to statehood to propose the name "Colorado" for the territory as they thought it would boost tourism and migration to their town. The Colorado in "Colorado City" appears to have come from the spanish for the red rocks around CO Springs.

Dorothy Aldridge has a book on Colorado City that may have more information.

I hope we can put this persistent (and oft-repeated) misconception to bed. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:31, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks to IP 97.118.64.152 who corrected the incorrect material added during these revisions. Please discuss on talk and provide sourcing that substantiates claims. ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:28, 6 June 2023 (UTC)