Talk:Corruption in South Sudan

A fact from Corruption in South Sudan appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 November 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that corruption in South Sudan is surpassed only by Somalia, North Korea, Sudan, and Afghanistan?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Corruption in South Sudan.

Wikipedia

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Africa: South Sudan / Sudan Mid‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Sudan (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sudan (assessed as High-importance).

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Class rating

I have made some extensive edits on the page over the past weeks and hope to get it rated. I am involved in article ratings myself but I generally stay away from rating my own pages. But I believe this article certainly qualifies for C-Class and possibly B-Class. I would like someone else to make these assessments. DaltonCastle (talk) 02:31, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, by my own standards, I would probably give this a B-Class rating, although I probably have a bias here, ha! Nonetheless if someone disagrees I would like them to let me know how the article can be improved so that we can get it to at least B-Class. DaltonCastle (talk) 02:34, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]