Talk:Coup (bridge)
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||
![]() | Contract bridge Mid‑importance | ||||||
|
Yes, I wondered whether to put the Bath coup as being pure/impure when I moved it. I suppose tempo gain is useful. I moved it as something like a Vienna coup ar a scissors coup leaves the defence helpless whereas a Bath coup might not. (Of course it still might!). Anyway, thinking about it, it would be daft to have a 'almost pure' section and it probably fits 'pure' better. Anyone got any better names than 'Pure' and 'Impure'? Cambion 09:36, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- Well... Maybe the "Impure" should be "Deceptive"? (Although, in my view, a "true" Grosvenor can only lose a trick but never gain one – the point is to get the opponent brainf*cked). But then, I don't have an idea for "Pure" ones – "classic", "straightforward", ...? Duja 10:58, 17 February 2006 (UTC)