Talk:Cypher (film)

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Really necessary?

Is it really necessary for a page like this to contain a detailed summary of the movie's entire plot? It's wikipedia, not Cliffs' notes, and besides, you know, it UTTERLY RUINS THE MOVIE for anyone who might be looking for casual information.75.64.190.54 (talk) 07:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes. I would refer you to every other _(movie) and _(film) page on Wikipedia. This is the format. It goes without saying you generally don't read the Plot section unless you want to know the plot. 86.167.58.162 (talk) 23:25, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Comparing it with The Dark Knight, it's about 600 words versus 1100. Which doesn't mean it couldn't be improved (anything about the critical reception to the movie?)No-genius (talk) 16:06, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Neo-noir?

Several film critics and film noir lists have identified Cypher as such. Shouldn't it be included in the Neo-noir category? Eridani (talk) 00:33, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cypher (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140905104012/http://moviemet.com/review/cypher-dvd-review to http://moviemet.com/review/cypher-dvd-review

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Audience scores

Please note that WP:USERGENERATED content such as from user voted web polls is not allowed. Online polls are not reliable sources WP:RS. That means that audience scores such as from Rotten Tomatoes and IMDB should not be added to this article. Only the Rotten Tomatoes critic score is allowed.

Audience scores should be removed if someone tries to add them back again. -- 109.79.75.32 (talk) 22:16, 17 February 2022 (UTC)