Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Dave Engle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconBiography: Sports and Games
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconBaseball: College / Twins / Mets Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject College baseball.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Minnesota Twins (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject New York Mets.
WikiProject iconUniversity of Southern California (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Southern California, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Random Evaluation

[edit]

This article is a randomly selected subject of my attempt to guage the evolving quality of Wikipedia. I will occasionally select 10 article at random (using the "Random article" feature, of course) and grade each of them using the Wikipedia:Good Article standard below:

What is a good article?
A good article has the following attributes.
1. It is well written.
2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
3. It is broad in its coverage, addressing all major aspects of the topic (this requirement is slightly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required by WP:FAC, and allows shorter articles and broad overviews of large topics to be listed);.
4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
5. It is stable, i.e., it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars.
6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

May 21, 2008

[edit]
  1. Dave Engle
    • Well written? - FAILED. A basic accumulation of facts, little more than a list in paragraph form.
    • Factually accurate? - FAILED - Unverifiable. Lacking in citation of claims. Only one source referenced.
    • Broad in its coverage? - FAILED. No personal information given in this biography.
    • NPOV - Yes.
    • Is it stable? - Yes.
    • Images - FAILED.

- Davodd (talk) 18:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]