Talk:Deborah Lippmann

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Women in Business Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This is notable

It's very telling that this page is empty and was deleted. Anyone who cares about nail polish knows the name Deborah Lippman, she has designed nail polish for Lady Gaga. Her polishes are sold in stores like Sephora. The old page should not have been deleted, it should have been neutralized and expanded.

This is one of the reasons we have so few pages about women, anything outside of the experience of the rather geeky, mostly male wikipedia editors is removed quite quickly. I can tell the old page was too commercial, but before I go about bringing it back I want to bring my concerns out in the open. futurebird (talk) 04:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

The above note

The above note was already here before this article was (again) nominated for deletion without much consideration at all. futurebird (talk) 15:15, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

More sources to use

http://www.renaissance-ny.org/success_story.html

Seems to show her in People magazine. I would like to find that article. It also has some nice background explaining how she got in to the business. futurebird (talk) 15:33, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

• http://www.stylelist.com/2010/10/21/deborah-lippmann/
• http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=CzopAAAAIBAJ&sjid=oI4DAAAAIBAJ&pg=2804,1480986&dq=deborah+lippmann&hl=en

Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 03:18, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks I'll look in to working these in. It's too bad that the hugely popular nail polish blogs probably can't be used as sources. futurebird (talk) 06:11, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deborah Lippmann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101128064843/http://www.vanityfair.com/online/beauty/2009/11/deborah-lippmann-is-hot-and-hip.html to http://www.vanityfair.com/online/beauty/2009/11/deborah-lippmann-is-hot-and-hip.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)