Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Discourse on Inequality

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconSwitzerland Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBooks
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.

Untitled

[edit]

Shouldnt the title be Discourse on the Origin of inequality? since thats the title of the book

How about Discourse on the Origins and the Foundations of Inequality among Men?Lestrade (talk) 18:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]

This article seems to fail to touch on the fact that Rousseau, according to the article [[1]] on him, thought that it was a failing in the Social Contract, not necessarily a failing of the Social Contract, one that could be rectified.

Nantucketnoon (talk) 10:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Improvement needed

[edit]

The last paragraph of "Content" seems redundant. 18.55.0.66 (talk) 13:34, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect from Full Title

[edit]

The full title of the book is "Discourse on the Origin of Inequality Among Men." That page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discourse_on_the_Origin_of_Inequality_Among_Men) should redirect here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.117.67.249 (talk) 18:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Length of text

[edit]

His 'text' runs about 26,000 words from the Gutenberg edition, which works out to about 100 pages at the commonly accepted number of 250 words per page, or 50 pages with denser presentation. It wouldn't hurt the article to work in a comment on the size of the document under discussion. — MaxEnt 09:11, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Arguments

[edit]

There seem to be some integral points in the text left out from this article. Some elaboration is possible, maybe on mimicry and pity. Liberty5651 (talk) 20:53, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]