This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
We have a not realiable source that says there was confusion between the two B-26s, clearly it didnt confuse the USAF as it did not have any Marauders left by 1948. So has anybody got a reliable source that explains who was confused. MilborneOne (talk) 14:48, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Probably mainly kids and generalist journalists who get confused. :) But I don't doubt there is some confusion, as both are WWII era aircraft, regardless of when the designations where used. I do remember someone on Wikipedia confusing the two within the past few years, so it does happen. BilCat (talk) 02:53, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
They would be referring to the general public (and not the kids - usually their granddads) - the Marauder was subject to considerable media attention during the war and so was very familiar to the public, the Invader not so much as the US media tended to provide a disproportionate amount of coverage of common, obsolete or failed types, while ignoring more capable aircraft the Germans and Japanese might want to actually know about. By the end of the war, there was little interest in piston powered medium bombers, and so the Invader barely got a mention, so people still get the two confused all the time, not having heard of the Invader. I haven't kept any of the books I have read that were specific to the A-26, but I recall seeing the confusion being mentioned more than once, perhaps in the more generalist sources. - NiD.29 (talk) 12:08, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}