Talk:Earning to give

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Effective Altruism High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Effective Altruism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relevant to effective altruism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Business Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Ethics / Modern Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces: /  Ethics Modern philosophy

Economics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unfounded claims about Sam Bankman-Fried

The edits from 134.76.162.163 about Sam Bankman-Fried seem to be unfounded (unproven claim that FTX is a Ponzi scheme) or irrelevant (about the FTX arena in Miami). I would suggest to reverse this paragraph to the previous version 90.252.89.160 (talk) 00:26, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

I agree. This specific incident probably doesn't merit mention in the lead, and certainly not in such a poorly-written paragraph. The "Ponzi scheme" claim sourced to an opinion piece is a WP:BLP concern. I've removed the paragraph from the lead, but I've expanded the body with more information about FTX's bankruptcy and its relevance to the topic of earning to give. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 08:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)