Talk:Eliana Benador

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Biography

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Switzerland Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Business Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removal of PR language

Because this article was created originally with WP:PEACOCK and NPOV problems, it was rewritten. In fact, it was those very problems which caused the Afd discussion -- it read like a press release and Benador's notability was lost behind a lot of PR language. As it currently stands, the article adheres to MOS:BIO guidelines. The lede should concisely state who she is (a publicist) and why she is notable, i.e. why she received signifiant coverage by independent sources (her work with Benador Associates). Not everything is appropriate for the introduction. Other than as a mention of her current status, her work with Benador Public Relations is considered non-notable because it has received no significant coverage. This doesn't mean her other work is unimportant, it simply means it lacks significance in an encyclopedic sense. This is the reason that her current work and other affiliations are noted only in the main text. — CactusWriter | ^needles 14:04, 8 November 2008 (UTC)