Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Emeliana Aiza

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Good articleEmeliana Aiza has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
    Article milestones
    DateProcessResult
    August 21, 2023Good article nomineeListed
    Did You Know
    A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 4, 2023.
    The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that while serving in the Bolivian parliament, legislator Emeliana Aiza took night courses to receive her high school baccalaureate?
    This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
    It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconBiography: Politics and Government
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
    Taskforce icon
    This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
    WikiProject iconBolivia Low‑importance
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Bolivia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all Bolivia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
    LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
    WikiProject iconOrganized Labour Low‑importance
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
    LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
    WikiProject iconPolitics Low‑importance
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
    LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
    WikiProject iconWomen
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
    WikiProject iconWomen in Red: #1day1woman (2023)
    WikiProject iconThis article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2023. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.
              Other talk page banners

    Article neutrality[edit]

    The articles seems to impart real information in a way that doesn’t add context to the subject of the article. 2605:8D80:408:269B:B010:48E8:E01D:A5D6 (talk) 05:38, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Your comment is incomprehensible. —Alalch E. 07:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    If my understanding is correct, you're saying some supplemental information in the article doesn't necessarily inform about the subject themselves? I suppose I can see that, especially in my mention of candidate selection mechanisms in Potosí or the aside on tensions over the gasolinazo. It's just my style to add additional context where I can, as I believe interesting asides enhance the article and give readers a broader perspective. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 07:22, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Although, I'm not sure what this has to do with article neutrality. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 07:24, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Link to Bolivia[edit]

    This is an article about a Bolivian politician, yet none of the mentions of Bolivia link back to the page on Bolivia.

    Why is this? I've noticed similar things on other articles. What's the rule on this? DontLikeRedesign (talk) 12:53, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    @DontLikeRedesign: At least for me, I generally don't link countries in articles, per MOS:OVERLINK, which includes nations in its list of subjects most readers are likely already familiar with. My interpretation is that if someone is reading an article about a Bolivian politician, they're probably at least somewhat knowledgeable about what Bolivia is. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 15:03, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]