Talk:Finitely generated abelian group
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
Mathematics Mid‑priority | |||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Another question
[edit]I am working on a problem to List all finite abelian groups of 100 elements, and have not found a very good example of how to work to obtaining such an answer. Would love a lower level of explanation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.181.52.53 (talk) 19:50, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- This is not the right place to ask such a question. Talk pages are to be used to discuss improvements to the article in question. For questions like yours, please see Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Mathematics. RobHar (talk) 03:19, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Rename to Finitely generated abelian group?
[edit]Surely the hyphen in the title is not appropriate? The word finitely is unambiguously an adverb, and is thus grammatically tied to the verb already. A hyphen would only be appropriate if some looser binding was grammatically possible. I see that there has been a back-and-forth renaming on this before, but I don't see any motivation or discussion. — Quondum☏ 10:16, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
- I see that WP:HYPHEN unambiguously supports my position (A hyphen is not used after a standard -ly adverb), and that the perpetrator was recently rapped on the knuckles for a related issue. Would anyone volunteer to do the move (there's a sequence, I'm not familiar with it and will probably bungle it)? — Quondum☏ 10:56, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
The theorem
[edit]Maybe Im blind here, but I dont actually see the theorem written anywhere. I see corollaries, I see examples, I see discussions about specific cases, I see referrals to special case theorems and to generalizations on the theorem, but I dont actually see the theorem written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.35.103.217 (talk) 22:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- The theorem is linked in the first line of the section, Classification. In case you can't find it, here it is: Fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups.—Anita5192 (talk) 22:54, 15 September 2017 (UTC)