Talk:Flight Safety Foundation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation Safety Network was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 25 July 2022 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Flight Safety Foundation. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Contested Speedy Delete

Article is only 10 minutes only. There are many sources to add. --neon white talk 19:38, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I left a comment on my talk page, but basically, I marked this article because it doesn't demonstrate notability at all. One line of text and a reference to the organization's homepage does not determine notability. If there are so many sources to add, then you should have either added them or marked this page as under construction. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 19:44, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article was only 10 minutes old. You need to give article time to be created. Apologies I couldnt find the template for under construction. Whilst there aren't as many sources as you would think for a foundation of this reputatation, i'm asserting notability on the basis of several reliable sources and the foundation being widely cited in both national newspapers, journals and papers.[1][2][3] It passes both the criteria at WP:ORG for non-commercial organisations in that "the scope of their activities is national or international in scale and that "information about the organization and its activities can be verified by third-party, independent, reliable sources." --neon white talk 23:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion is a nonsense. Anyone who knows anything about the aviation industry is well aware of the significance of the Flight Safety Foundation from which one concludes that HelloAnnyong is totally ignorant of aviation. No one should delete any article simply because they are ignorant of the subject. This user should have their editing privileges withdrawn for a period to give them time to think about their approach. treesmill (talk) 06:29, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]