Talk:Frank Chance

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Biography: Sports and Games

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
	This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Baseball: Hall of Fame / Old-time Base Ball / Cubs / Yankees High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hall of Fame task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Old-time Base Ball task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chicago Cubs (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York Yankees (assessed as Mid-importance).

Chicago Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Illinois Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greatest amateur brawler

Chance has been called "greatest amateur brawlwer in the world", & once fined his players $10 for shaking hands with opposing team. Trekphiler 00:06, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Frank Chance/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 15:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Having previously reviewed Evers, I might as well make the full double play. Comments to follow in the next 1-3 days; thanks as always for your work on these. -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

After these, I'm planning on taking Baseball's Sad Lexicon to GA to make it a Good Topic. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:07, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

That's a fun idea--good luck with it. -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:15, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Okay, on first pass, I don't see any issues here. Prose looks solid, research looks good, and in general it seems to be your usual high-quality work. As usual I've made a few tweaks that you should feel free to revert. -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:15, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Checklist

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Pass