Talk:Gülen movement

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Organizations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Turkey High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion: Interfaith Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

Cheating at the Public Service Entry Examinations - In the source article no solid proof is mentioned.

"Algemeen ambtsbericht Turkije oktober 2019 - Ambtsbericht - Rijksoverheid.nl". www.rijksoverheid.nl (in Dutch) (Ministerie van Algemene Zaken). 31 October 2019.

The article above is as the source of the section "Cheating at the Public Service Entry Examinations, 2010" in the references written. However in the English version of the source article there is not any solid proof that can be considered as reliable source for the cheating allegations. The following statement is written in the article:

According to the confidential source, it is widely known that Gülenists had copied exam papers beforehand in order to help other Gülenists into key positions within the Turkish government. (P. 30)

Information from this confidential source can not be an evidence that supports the cheating allegations, since it has neither solid evidence nor any reference that can be counted as reliable source. Moreover the confidential source says that this information is a "widely known" fact but does not mention the scope of the popularity of this information. Widely known by who? By authorities? By people who watch television channels that are in political engagement with that government? Regarding these thoughts a revision and correction of this section strongly suggested.

The Lead-In part is too bloated

Someone needs to shrink those long ass texts and put them in the body of this page instead of shoving everything in the leading paragraphs

Removing Tag and improving article

Came across this article and as per the post above, it could do with a massive improvement. It appears to be a contentious subject matter and I know literally nothing about them or the history which makes me ideal due to a lack of bias and being independent, but it also makes me the worst candidate due to a lack of knowledge. Im going to go away and read up and may then comeback and see what I can do. Or maybe this is in the too hard basket. Will see. MaskedSinger (talk) 05:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Not sunni Islam

Gullen movement is similar to Ahmadiyah movement. Seems to be Islam but it is not. 186.82.99.49 (talk) 16:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)