Talk:Ghiyas-ud-din Baraq

Military history: Medieval C‑class

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
C	This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces: /  Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Central Asia Start‑class Low‑importance

	Ghiyas-ud-din Baraq is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

ulus

More explanation?

Please?

Thank You.

[[ hopiakuta | [[ [[%c2%a1]] [[%c2%bf]] [[ %7e%7e%7e%7e ]] -]] 15:14, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

How does Nikpai fit into this?

I just started article Nikpai, and it seems his claimed rule (1270-1271 or so) does not fit into the chronology of the Chagatai given on Wikipedia. Thoughts on which version of the story may be correct? Or am I misunderstanding what subsets each person was in charge of? 12:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)