Talk:H. Rex Lee
H. Rex Lee has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 16, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation. | This article is within the scope of||
This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). |
WikiProject Polynesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Polynesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | This article is within the scope of||
Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
This article is supported by the American Samoa work group (assessed as Low-importance). |
WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. | This article is within the scope of||
Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
WikiProject Idaho (assessed as Low-importance). | This article is supported by
WikiProject United States Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Territories of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | This article is within the scope of||
Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A fact from H. Rex Lee appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 October 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Attribution
[edit]Reference copied from Governor H. Rex Lee Auditorium to H. Rex Lee. See former article's editing history for names of contributors. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:34, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:H. Rex Lee/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 09:11, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Review
[edit]As this is the oldest nomination, I'll take it on. I am interested in politics, which helps. I'll be using the basic criteria below as a checklist and hope to provide the review soon. Please contact me if there is anything I should know about the article that might influence the review. Thanks. No Great Shaker (talk) 09:11, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- Well written: the prose is clear and concise.
- Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch (e.g., "awesome" and "stunning").
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction. Not applicable.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation. Not applicable.
- Complies with the MOS guidelines for use of quotations.
- All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided.
- All inline citations are from reliable sources, etc.
- Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline.
- No original research.
- No copyright violations or plagiarism.
- Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style.
- Neutral.
- Stable.
- Illustrated, if possible. Not applicable.
- Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright. Not applicable.
This is looking good. I've had to do a certain amount of copyediting to tidy things up but nothing major. The only thing outstanding is request for an additional citation at the end of a sentence containing quotes. I'm placing the article on hold for now and, if the remaining citation can be provided fairly soon, I'll be happy to pass this. It's interesting, concise, well written and informative. Thanks. No Great Shaker (talk) 19:24, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Okay, well, I was just about to fail this because of no response but I decided to try and find the necessary source myself and, guess what, the content including quotation is in the same article as that in the next sentence. Problem solved and I can instead now pass the article, which I'm very pleased to do. Well done. No Great Shaker (talk) 15:07, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class Polynesia articles
- Low-importance Polynesia articles
- GA-Class American Samoa articles
- Low-importance American Samoa articles
- American Samoa articles
- WikiProject Polynesia articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Idaho articles
- Low-importance Idaho articles
- WikiProject Idaho articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- GA-Class United States Territories articles
- Mid-importance United States Territories articles
- WikiProject United States Territories articles
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Wikipedia Did you know articles