Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Hillary Clinton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
view · edit
Frequently asked questions
Q1: Was there a dispute about what the article title should be?
A1: Yes. From the early days on it was "Hillary Rodham Clinton", but over the years there were many formal requests for moves to change it to "Hillary Clinton". Discussions found no consensus on the article name until June 2015, when one found consensus and the article was moved to its current title. See the "This page was previously nominated to be moved" box elsewhere on this page for full details and links to the discussions – note some have to be revealed under the "Older discussions" link. There are strong feelings on both sides and discussions get progressively longer and more heated.
Q2: The section on her 2016 presidential campaign leaves out some important things that have happened. What gives?
A2: The main article is tight on space and the presidential campaign section is intentionally brief and kept to what is biographically most relevant. The daughter article Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016 has a much fuller treatment of the campaign and is where the greatest level of detail should go, especially anything describing the day-to-day, to-and-fro, ups-and-downs of a campaign.
Q3: This article is POV! It's biased {for, against} her! It reads like it was written by {her PR team, Republican hatchet men}!
A3: Complaints of bias are taken very seriously, but must be accompanied by specific areas of concern or suggestions for change. Vague, general statements do not help editors. Edits that add {{pov}} tags without providing a detailed explanation on the talk page will likely be reverted.
Q4: Where is the article or section that lists her controversies?
A4: There isn't one. All controversial material is included in the normal biographical sections they occur in, in this article (including sometimes in Notes or footnotes) and in the various daughter articles. Having a separate "controversies" or "criticisms" article or section is considered a violation of WP:NPOV, WP:Content forking, and WP:Criticism and also raises significant WP:BLP concerns. A special effort was undertaken to rid all 2008 presidential candidates' articles of such treatment – see here – and the same was done for other politicians' articles, including all the 2012 and 2016 candidates. This approach was also confirmed by the results of this AfD and this AfD.
Q5: Something in the lead section doesn't have a footnote. I'm going to put a {{citation needed}} tag on it.
A5: This article, like many others on Wikipedia, uses the approach of no citations in the lead section, as everything in the lead should be found in the body of the article, along with its citation. See guideline: MOS:LEADCITE.
Former featured articleHillary Clinton is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 21, 2019.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 9, 2007Good article nomineeListed
May 14, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
June 7, 2007Good article nomineeListed
October 14, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 21, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
February 28, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
May 27, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 18, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
June 6, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
December 13, 2014Featured article candidatePromoted
September 24, 2022Featured article reviewDemoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 7, 2015, November 7, 2018, and November 7, 2020.
Current status: Former featured article
This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.WikiProject iconHillary Clinton (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Hillary Clinton, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
WikiProject iconBiography: Politics and Government
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Top-importance).
WikiProject iconU.S. Congress Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article is about one (or many) person(s).
WikiProject iconBarack Obama (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Barack Obama, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
WikiProject iconPolitics: American Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Top-importance).
WikiProject iconUnited States: Arkansas / Cape Cod and the Islands / Presidential elections / Presidents / Government High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Arkansas (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Cape Cod and the Islands (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Top-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Top-importance).
WikiProject iconChicago Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconIllinois High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconNew York (state) High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen's History High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen writers Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
WikiProject iconInternational relations High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
          Other talk page banners
Section sizes
Section size for Hillary Clinton (52 sections)
Section name Byte
count
Section
total
(Top) 9,655 9,655
Early life and education 29 28,440
Early life 9,927 9,927
Wellesley College years 9,982 9,982
Yale Law School and postgraduate studies 8,502 8,502
Marriage, family, legal career and first ladyship of Arkansas 213 30,771
From the East Coast to Arkansas 2,258 2,258
Early Arkansas years 8,150 8,150
Later Arkansas years 13,873 13,873
Bill Clinton 1992 presidential campaign 6,277 6,277
First Lady of the United States (1993–2001) 3,349 32,475
Health care and other policy initiatives 6,145 6,145
International diplomacy and promotion of women's rights 4,500 4,500
Scandals and investigations 6,923 6,923
It Takes a Village and other writings 5,256 5,256
Response to Lewinsky scandal 3,403 3,403
Save America's Treasures initiative 702 702
Traditional duties 2,197 2,197
U.S. Senate (2001–2009) 76 31,628
2000 U.S. Senate election 4,190 4,190
First term 16,932 16,932
2006 reelection campaign 3,201 3,201
Second term 7,229 7,229
2008 presidential campaign 17,240 17,240
Secretary of State (2009–2013) 472 60,662
Nomination and confirmation 5,926 5,926
Tenure 28,561 39,645
Overall themes 11,084 11,084
Benghazi attack and subsequent hearings 14,619 14,619
Email controversy 15,075 15,075
Clinton Foundation, Hard Choices, and speeches 7,213 7,213
2016 presidential campaign 21,283 21,283
Post-2016 election activities 12,653 12,653
Political positions 4,584 18,777
Economics 970 970
Domestic policy 3,281 3,281
LGBT rights 2,425 2,425
Immigration 2,328 2,328
Foreign policy 5,189 5,189
Religious views 1,256 1,256
Cultural and political image 10,945 10,945
Books and recordings 3,535 3,535
Ancestry 1,779 1,779
See also 248 248
Notes 24 24
References 15 4,785
Citations 34 34
Works cited 4,736 4,736
External links 108 8,510
Official 678 678
Media coverage 125 125
Other 7,599 7,599
Total 316,954 316,954

Can you guys add New Portrait because the picture that we have is from 2016 it is 8 years old

[edit]

Please 5.122.87.32 (talk) 09:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The picture we have at Thomas Jefferson is from 1800 and is therefore 224 years old. This does not seem to be a problem. BD2412 T 15:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just searched for "deplorables" in the article

[edit]

and the word is not there. That's the most consequential word she said in her life, it should be in the article. 86.31.178.164 (talk) 12:17, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's there - the page template has a link to the article, Basket of deplorables. BD2412 T 13:54, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please specify exactly where it is on the page; I can't find it. YoPienso (talk) 14:10, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In the page footer, there is a template titled "Hillary Clinton"; click [show] and it is in the template. BD2412 T 14:16, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. So, for all practical purposes, it's not in the article; it's buried and hidden from all but the most assiduous seekers. That may be OK in the BLP, but it should be in plain view in Public image of Hillary Clinton. It's not, at present. Let's fix that. YoPienso (talk) 14:41, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why is it important? It seems more relevant to the article about the 2016 campaign. TFD (talk) 15:10, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds reasonable, and there it is, in its own little sub-subsection, with a link to a full article. Thanks! YoPienso (talk) 17:55, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WJLA: "2016 Clinton campaign, PAC skirted federal financing rules, court finds"

[edit]

WJLA is the ABC News affiliate in Washington D.C. They just published an article called "2016 Clinton campaign, PAC skirted federal financing rules, court finds."

Is this the kind of subject that should be covered in this article?

Does this source meet the standards for info on living people?

https://wjla.com/news/nation-world/2016-clinton-campaign-pac-skirted-federal-financing-rules-court-finds-correct-the-record-hillary-clintons-2016-presidential-campaign-stretched-federal-financing-rules-a-washington-dc-appeals-court-ruled-tuesday

Homer's Triple Bypass (talk) 14:56, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This phrase isn't neutral. Hillary did not lose "despite" winning the popular vote; winning the popular vote isn't actually connected to winning orl losing the U.S presidency. It's notable enough to mention, but in a more neutral phrasing like "while winning the popular vote." I notice Donald Trump's page says he "won the election while losing the popular vote." Woozybydefault (talk) 17:20, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"winning the popular vote isn't actually connected to winning orl losing the U.S presidency" It is highly notable. We have a List of United States presidential elections in which the winner lost the popular vote, and this has only happened in 5 highly controversial elections. Dimadick (talk) 21:25, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]