Talk:Historiography

This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:History Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Sociology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Writing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Writing, a WikiProject interested in improving Wikipedia's coverage of content related to the fields of rhetoric, composition, technical communication, literacy, and language studies.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Asian historiography

South Asian historiography is not mentioned in this article. When did it start? What characterises it? Acwilson9 (talk) 06:51, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Undue section?

The recently added section Historiographic and Conceptual Problems of North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa seems out of place in this broad overview of historiography; it's much too specific and technical for an article on such a general topic and gives undue weight to a specific aspect of historiography. I don't know if there's a better place for this content. What do others think? Lennart97 (talk) 16:00, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

cliometrics

As a quantitative economic history graduate I can confidently say that cliometrics is not about history anymore. This subdiscipline almost completely engaged to economics. It has a controversial contribution to historiography. Some quantitative ecohist do not even know the language of the society she is writing about. I suggest you to add history of capitalism as the historicized version of economic history. I can also contribute the improvement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.209.32.73 (talk) 06:07, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Cliometrics is generally not considered a historical field by historians. That's why even most known economic history journals are not cited by them. So I agree with this comment. Is there any objection? 88.230.143.189 (talk) 04:16, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Content Area Literacy

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2023 and 6 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Calebbeausoleil.

— Assignment last updated by Calebbeausoleil (talk) 18:59, 24 April 2023 (UTC)