Talk:Huwala people

This page was proposed for deletion by 94.129.50.114 (talk · contribs) on 23 August 2012 with the comment:
Disinformation
It was contested by Shia soldier (talk · contribs) on 2012-08-23

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

African diaspora Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Original page

I don't know why, but an editor deleted the content of Huwala and made it a redirect to this page. Possibly the reason was to hide the history of that page which dates back to 11 February 2006. I noticed there was a lot of edit wars there and this could be a way to try to push someone's personal POV. Mohamed CJ (talk) 10:48, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i wanted to change the name because it wouldnt let me Shia soldier (talk) 12:09, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

yea it also was a good idea to make a fresh article Shia soldier (talk) 13:34, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion tag

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I know nothing about the content of this article or whether it should or should not be deleted. However, once a proposed deletion is contested, it is not supposed to be restored. I am therefore requesting that the proposed deletion tag be removed. If people think the article should be deleted, then an AFD should be started. Again, I have no opinion on whether the article should or shouldn't be deleted and know nothing about the content . . . I'm only saying that prod can no longer be used on the article since it was contested. Calathan (talk) 15:53, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done This is a valid request, the {{proposed deletion/dated}} was indeed removed and restored several times. So, I consider the above to be a valid WP:CONTESTED, and have de-prodded it on behalf of Calathan, because the article is full-prot.

Besides that, I've also restore the three cleanup tags that have gone missing, since I consider these to be genuine concerns. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]