Talk:Immigration Act of 1917

Discrimination Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

United States: Asian Americans Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Asian Americans (assessed as Mid-importance).

Law

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mcarran Act and the remaining part of the Alien and Sedition Acts

Our article says, "The McCarran-Walter Act revised all previous laws and regulations regarding immigration, naturalization, and nationality, and collected into one comprehensive statute." Did the McCarran-Walter Act revise the Alien Enemies Act (part of the Alien and Sedition Acts)? The Alien Enemies Act was revised and remains on the books as 50 U.S.C. 21-24. MBUSHIstory (talk) 01:07, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

1924 act?

Wasn't the 1924 act more the direct successor to this one than the 1952 act was? -- AnonMoos (talk) 01:46, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Immigration Act of 1917. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051124173118/http://www.ailf.org/ipc/policy_reports_2005_barredzone.asp to http://www.ailf.org/ipc/policy_reports_2005_barredzone.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:54, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Map is wrong?

I just added the geographic exclusion quote from the act. It doesn’t seem to exclude the Middle East or Iran? That would make the map incorrect. Onceinawhile (talk) 19:27, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

See this map.... Onceinawhile (talk) 19:29, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

See this comment from 2017 [1] Onceinawhile (talk) 19:30, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Another problem with the map?

Another issue with the map. That concerns the Philippines, which were a US territory in 1917. According to the map, the Philippines were subject to the geographic exclusion established by the 1917 law. However, the text indicates that the Philippines were *not* subject to this exclusion in 1917; that was true until 1924. Someone needs to sort this out. Oaklandguy (talk) 09:06, 17 February 2020 (UTC)