Talk:Indo-Caribbean Americans

Caribbean Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Asian Americans Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Asian Americans (assessed as High-importance).

Black Indians

Are they referred to as "black" or as "black indians"?

Why on earth would that be? Guyana and Trinidad were pretty much polarised politically and socially into Indian and Black, hence a racial mixture of the two would be extremely rare and in any case would be called Afro-Indian or Afro-Indo-Carribean. Afro-Indo-Carribean Americans in this case. Bloody hell this subcatagorising is getting silly isn't it? --JamesTheNumberless 15:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Afro-Indo racial mixture is "extremely rare"? Really? When 18% of the population is mixed and most of them are of mixed African and Indian descent, how is that "rare"? Guettarda 16:29, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't very much like the term as at first glance it suggested a typically American ignorance of ex-colonial culture. Specifically I thought: Why would the entire Indo-Carribean emigré population be referred to as Black-Indians when only a fraction of 18% of them are at all ethnically black? I do of course now realise this could be a reference to black Carribean culture, shared by Indo-Carribeans, and not necessarily race. --JamesTheNumberless 17:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

An utter waste of bandwidth

I have to agree - there's really no purpose to this page other than highlighting the fact that people move around. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.95.101.245 (talk) 02:17, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Seriously though, why have this article and not:

Indo-Carribean British Indo-Carribean French Indo-Carribean Dutch Indo-Carribean Indian

etc.

Merge it with Indo-Carribean or get rid of it. Either that or come up with some reason why this fragment is notable in itself or some notable people under the category. --JamesTheNumberless 15:48, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Please moderate your language. Your campaign against articles related to these ethnic groups is starting to feel racist. Guettarda 16:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

I simply beleive that a lot of this fragmented information would be better off consolodated into a single entry. I don't understand why Indo-Carribean Americans is a separate entry when there is no new information of note contained within it. --JamesTheNumberless 17:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Much better now

This is much more like it, well done everyone who has contributed material since I last visited here and left my rant :) Hopefully the missing citations will follow. --JamesTheNumberless 18:31, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Tamil American which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:30, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Tamil Americans which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 08:14, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Indo-Caribbean Americans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060225002716/http://factfinder.census.gov:80/servlet/DTTable?_bm=y&-context=dt&-ds_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U&-CONTEXT=dt&-mt_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U_PCT019&-tree_id=403&-redoLog=true&-all_geo_types=N&-geo_id=01000US&-search_results=01000US&-format=&-_lang=en to http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DTTable?_bm=y&-context=dt&-ds_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U&-CONTEXT=dt&-mt_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U_PCT019&-tree_id=403&-redoLog=true&-all_geo_types=N&-geo_id=01000US&-search_results=01000US&-format=&-_lang=en

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Indo-Caribbean Americans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050829162416/http://www.chhayacdc.org/pdf/study.pdf to http://www.chhayacdc.org/pdf/study.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:08, 8 January 2018 (UTC)