Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Industrial Canal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconUnited States: Louisiana / New Orleans High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana - New Orleans (assessed as High-importance).
WikiProject iconTransport: Maritime
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Maritime task force.

Confluence of Waterways

[edit]

Replacing references to the Industrial Canal's intersection(s) with the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet, I inserted wording referring instead to the IHNC's confluence with both of those waterways. In short order, I corrected one of the reference points I'd used, replacing "vicinity of France Road" with "a point north of the Florida Avenue Bridge." Commercial mariners refer to the latter location as the "Industrial Intersection," but that might be more detail than is needed. -- Muffuletta 20:12, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of Ninth Ward

[edit]

There seems to be heated disagreement among some contributors to this article regarding the canal's use as a border between wards of New Orleans. Perhaps this should be discussed here, rather than continually yanking text in and out of the article itself? Or maybe the subject needn't even be mentioned in this article. Or maybe a map would help. I kind of doubt whether the average reader of this article around the planet will care that much about the particulars of this. -- Muffuletta 20:12, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to the canal functioning as a boundary, I hope we have finally settled on the fact that the canal is not an actual boundary. It can be arbitrarily regarded as a functional boundary--that is a geographic barrier, but not a political one--for the 9th ward (all of it). The actual western boundary for the 9th Ward is Almonaster Ave., so it is best to refrain from referring to the industrial canal as a boundary. In fact, it goes through the 9th Ward, so even west of the Industrial canal is still the 9th ward. It must also be noted that the 9th Ward reaches as far north as the Lake, which is its northern boundary. It is an EXTREMELY common misconception that the area commonly called "New Orleans East" is not the 9th ward, even though this is actually the bulk of the territory defined as the 9th Ward.Wbbigtymer 21:57, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Industrial Canal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]