Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Jarlig

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconLaw Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMongols: Mongol Empire Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mongols, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mongol culture, history, language, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WikiProject icon
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article is supported by Mongol Empire task force.

Title does not match the spelling mainly used: jarlig vs. jarliq[edit]

I'm editing Aleksandr Mikhailovich of Tver, which uses two spellings of this concept: iarlyk and yarlyk. A principle of editing is to stick with one standard (in spelling, punctuation, etc.) throughout, even if you mention alternatives early on.

This article begins by providing alternate spellings: "Jarlig (Mongolian: зарлиг; Russian: iarlyk, also transliterated yarlyk and the Tartar: yarligh)..." Jarliq is not among them, however it is used in the article 14 times! Jarlig is used as well, and is sometimes italicized.

I don't have the wherewithal to A. figure out if jarliq is a conventional transliteration in established sources and therefore should be added in the initial list of spellings, or B. standardize spelling and italic use throughout after determining which spelling is the most common. I'm going to use yarlyk in the other article, and that's the best I can do. Sorry all I can do here is point this out.

Thanks in advance, --Geekdiva (talk) 19:33, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling[edit]

Honestly, the spelling of concepts and proper nouns in this article is all over the place and seems to be a result of translating some non-English text. 217.100.14.122 (talk) 15:00, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]