Talk:Jen Kiggans

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Biography: Politics and Government

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Virginia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) Person(s).

Jen Kiggans’ political stance

For Marquardtika (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Marquardtika&action=view)

OK, I get that even a high-end color flyer published by a political candidate simply summarizing her manifesto may not appear to conform to Wiki guidelines. But an internationally accessible campaign headquarters website likely does. By your interpretation, the President’s own words during a press conferences are not allowed on Wiki until some biased reporter paraphrases them? What about Elon Musk on Twitter? Under your interpretation, a quote that speaks to a future Space-X goal is disallowed? (What about Trump on Twitter?) If a celebrity posts a blurb detailing their impending death from cancer on their fan club’s Facebook page, you would revert that if quoted on Wiki? Most importantly, other than your claimed “former journalist” bona fides (in your system, not factual unless published elsewhere), who or what qualified you as a Wiki policeman? Quoting a political candidate’s published manifesto - like quoting an author’s book (vice a critic’s review)- absolutely conforms to Wiki’s standards. Do you want to take on the task of deleting every “book quote” on Wiki? Of course not; it would take a couple of lifetimes. Own your mistake and revert your revert. CarlitosCorazon 11:30, 16 April 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CharleyHart (talk • contribs)

Kiggans “opposes abortion rights”

“Opposes abortion rights”—vague statement—there have never been so-called “rights” to abortion; also there is no clear evidence for this allegation Nurselindasue (talk) 20:16, 30 October 2022 (UTC)