Talk:Kambar (poet)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

India: Tamil Nadu / History / Classical Tamil Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Classical Tamil workgroup (assessed as High-importance).
	This article was last assessed in December 2018.

---

Untitled

Kambar or Kamban? RickK 05:10, Jun 17, 2004 (UTC)

Both are correct.Kambar is the actual name. Kamban is used fondly and is less formal. This is something like calling William as Bill.

Details of Kambaramayanam

I feel that the last two paragraphs in this article talks about Kambaramayanam and hence should be moved to that article. Objections??GurufromIndia 14:14, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Yes I also think so —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravivijayaraghavan (talk • contribs) 06:53, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Actually, the name is Kamban. It is changed to Kambar in Tamil, when we want to honor the person named Kamban. Thus, we find Tamilians changing Raman to Ramar, or Dasharatha becoming Dasharathar, or Sugrivaa becoming Sugrivar. But, Ravana is always Ravana, never Ravanar, since he does not deserve any respect. I hope that makes the point.

Anyway, I find the original author's remarks about unique Tamilian sensitivities (????) to be very very offensive. The author displays both a unique (shall we say Tamilian) arrogance as well as ignorance. It should be noted that Kamban was a scholar of both Tamil and Sanskrit. The so-called modification is actually obtained from Mahrishi Vyasa's work known as the Adhyatma Ramayanam. This is NOT widely studied and discusses the deeper spiritual and philosophical significance of Valmiki's work. I do hope the offensive section will be deleted (actually that will mean deleting the entire article since everything revolves around this "uniqueness" myth) and that the original author of this article will stop indulging in such fantasies about such unique Tamilian sensitivities and educate himself/herself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vlaxmanan (talk • contribs) 15:39, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 18:24, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Details about Kamba Ramayana

Legend has iot that only Valmiki Ramayan has been written by Lord Ganesha. Its not the Kamba Ramayana —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravivijayaraghavan (talk • contribs) 06:48, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Where did Kampar learned all of those? There was any Academies or Universities around that time ? Kamapar, Auwaiyar, Pookallenthiyar, Ottaikoothar and pretty same time Sayankondar all were there. Something sound not normal... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.173.243.161 (talk) 21:25, 27 November 2010 (UTC)