Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Karma Police

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconSongs
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
WikiProject iconAlternative music Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Key of A minor in the verse?[edit]

Going by the online chords, jamming along with the track, and the link in the references to the sheet music (at least the part you can see without paying), it doesn't look like the verse is in the key of A minor (Aeolian), despite the "Composition" section of the article stating: "The first half is in the key of A minor ('Karma Police...') "

Instead, it looks like it's in A Dorian. There's a lot of F# in the chords (D major, B minor), with only a momentary shift to A minor with the F chord. The opening move from A minor to D major clearly establishes a Dorian feel too. Furthermore, the sheet music has an F# rather than an F natural in the key signature. So it's in A, yes, but not Aeolian. Dorian is a minor mode too.

I don't want to edit the article in case someone has a good counter-argument or source that actually makes a compelling case for A minor/Aeolian. But I do think the information in the article is probably wrong, and at least misleading; and the reference (2) does not actually back up the claims in the article, but seemingly contradicts it.