Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Katrina Leung

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Note icon
An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
WikiProject iconChicago Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
WikiProject iconCrime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEspionage Low‑importance
WikiProject iconKatrina Leung is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconChina Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
WikiProject iconUnited States Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Untitled

[edit]

When I indicated she was a spy in the first draft of this article, though, I meant for the FBI- a fact which is not in doubt. -- jleybov — Preceding undated comment added 20:17, 22 April 2003

It maybe worth a discussion to remove the "political conisderation" section since it gives only single point of view with no conservative voice in dissent — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.161.49.224 (talkcontribs) 14:50, 4 January 2006

I remove the "political discussion section". It's nothing but a one-sided political analysis and adds nothing substantive to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.143.5.152 (talkcontribs) 04:40, 23 March 2006

I too removed the politacal discussion section - same reason as above - MZ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.228.222.112 (talkcontribs) 17:46, 24 May 2006

Someone ought to go through the DoJ report about the case, since it is probably the most definitive account of the case (the press reporting here has some errors in it). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.252.93.105 (talkcontribs) 21:46, 9 September 2006

This link wasn't used in the article and doesn't appear to contribute anything important. 06:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Affair

[edit]

Why does this article not mention the affair between her and Agent Smith? Sephiroth storm (talk) 23:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How can Leung's passport be from ROC?

[edit]

If Leung was born in 1954 in mainland China, how can she hold ROC passport since PRC was already in control of her birthplace well before that time? If her parents brought her to Taiwan or other places under ROC control, which enables her to get a passport from ROC, this is not mentioned at all. The point is, does she have a valid passport from ROC in the first place, or was it a fake? The other possibility was she was born and raised in mainland China, then came to US. --Happyseeu (talk) 15:35, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Katrina Leung

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Katrina Leung's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "latimes":

  • From Federal Bureau of Investigation: Jalon, Allan M. (2006-04-08). "A Break-In to End All Break-Ins". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2006-06-06.
  • From Caroline Leonetti Ahmanson: Mary Rourke, Caroline Leonetti Ahmanson, 83; Philanthropist Supported the Arts, The Los Angeles Times, July 23, 2005

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 11:51, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]