Talk:Ken Caldeira

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Biography: Science and Academia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Climate change Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Weather: Biographies Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Biographies task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Limnology and Oceanography Mid‑importance

	This article is part of the WikiProject Limnology and Oceanography to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the inland waters and marine environments. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on limnology- or oceanography-related topics, as well as to ensure that limnology and oceanography articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stanford University Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Stanford University, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Stanford University on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Caldeira criticisms of IPCC & resignation, as reported in NY Times.

The current version in our article strikes me as not really a fair summary of the source. Here it is: New Directions for the Intergovernmental Climate Panel , a NY Times article which has several long quotes from KC.

The originally-posted version in his wikibio read:

In 2011, Caldeira resigned as a lead author of an IPCC AR5 chapter. He commented to the New York Times: "Can anybody point to any important positive outcomes resulting from the IPCC AR4 process? Is there reason to expect a greater positive impact from the IPCC AR5 process?

I am all for scientific reviews and assessments, and I think the multi-model comparisons reviewed by the IPCC have been especially useful. However, it is not clear how much additional benefit there is to having a huge bureaucratic scientific review effort under UN auspices..." [cited to Revkin's NYT article, linked above]

Revkin subsequently added an update from KC, which needs to be noted, but our current summary elides all his criticisms of the IPCC. Perhaps a 3rd party could make a try at a fair summary of his comments to the Times? Thanks, Pete Tillman (talk) 06:50, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

A fair summary would note Caldeira's clear balance of opinion, as is currently the case. Do you really think he wants this bio to go into misleading and excessive detail of his concerns that the IPCC needs strengthened to be as effective as he wants it to be? . . dave souza, talk 17:36, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

No, I think we need to follow the source, Dave -- unless you have another RS re this topic? Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 21:05, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

We follow the source to summarise Ken Caldeira's clear position, not cherry pick it to promote an agenda opposing his views: that's a clear BLP violation. . . dave souza, talk 07:25, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ken Caldeira. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091124182854/http://e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2201 to http://www.e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2201

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC)