Talk:Ken Wyatt

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Biography: Politics and Government

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Western Australia / Perth / Politics / Indigenous peoples Low‑importance

	Ken Wyatt is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Perth (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Parliamentary Friends of Diabetes

Looking to add a sentence to the Career section, that highlights Wyatts' role as Chair of the Parliamentary Friends of Diabetes group. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sre743 (talk • contribs) 00:00, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Ken Wyatt left the Liberal Party over it's decision to oppose the voice referendum

Ken Wyatt left the Liberals over the party's opposition to the Indigenous voice referendum.

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/former-indigenous-australians-minister-ken-wyatt-quits-the-liberal-party-over-its-voice-stance/t7skkovad

https://nit.com.au/06-04-2023/5527/ken-wyatt-resigns-from-liberal-party-over-duttons-opposition-to-indigenous-voice

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-06/ken-wyatt-quits-liberals-over-voice-to-parliament-stance/102197862

https://thewest.com.au/news/indigenous-voice-to-parliament/ken-wyatt-quits-liberal-party-after-federal-mps-resolve-to-campaign-against-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-c-10270815

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/former-minister-ken-wyatt-reportedly-quits-liberal-party-over-voice-decision/news-story/57f7d9d5e316f1da72417f53fd34f7d5 PaulGorduiz106 (talk) 05:18, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. Other editors had already updated briefly before I got there, but I added more using your sources. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:17, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Infobox dates

RoadSmasher420, it's better to use the talk page than to engage in edit warring. My view is that while we're still in April 2023, it makes sense to put the exact date of Wyatt's resignation in the infobox, as it's easier for readers to locate while the news is still fresh. When the year ticks over to 2024 (or longer), it's less current and therefore less important to have the exact date. I would like a few other editors to opine here so that a consensus can be reached on this, which of course I am happy to abide by even if it goes against my view. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:04, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

I definitely understand your view and appreciate your reasoning. However, I believe that only '2023' is enough, both for consistency with other articles and to keep the infobox concise. I don't think it's fully necessary to have the exact date in the short summary that is the infobox, and that most readers who really want to know precise details will instead venture into the rest of the article. RoadSmasher420 (talk) 06:19, 15 April 2023 (UTC)