Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Kooyong Classic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconAustralia: Melbourne / Sports Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconKooyong Classic is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
StartThis article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports (assessed as Low-importance).
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Request for wider input on discussion at WikiProject Tennis

[edit]

There is a long, ongoing discussion at d in tennis articles on English-language Wikipedia (e.g., this type of table). The discussion is about whether the "official sponsored name" of a tournament - such as Pacific Life Open - or another tournament name without the sponsor - such as Indian Wells Masters - must be used in those articles. Please join the discussion here. Thanks. Tennis expert (talk) 09:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

non-sponsor name

[edit]

This tournament has a perfectly good non-sponsor name (Kooyong Classic) and is well known by this name, and therefore should not be titled or primarily referred to by the temporary sponsor name. Is anyone against a move to "Kooyong Classic"? — Limabeans 05:12, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kooyong Classic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:18, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]