Talk:Kru languages
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||
 | Languages | ||||||
| |||||||
| This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
 | This article is supported by WikiProject Liberia (assessed as Mid-importance). | |
.svg/28px-Africa_(orthographic_projection).svg.png){kind=small}
wikipedia needs a
[edit]wikipedia needs to get an African linguist! there is no information on African languages, and the development. Markthemac (talk) 13:49, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Independent family
[edit]From Glottolog 4.4 : Kru lacks sufficient lexical resemblances and noun class resemblances to conclude a relationship with Atlantic-Congo, Tom Güldemann 2018 (Jkrn111 (talk) 19:36, 22 May 2021 (UTC)).
- @Jkrn111: Yeah, but the logical order would be: change the prose first, then infobox + catergorization. The worst we can have is unsynchronized classifications. Another thing is consistency. If we follow Glottolog in following Güldemann's assessment, we have to treat Ubangi in the same way (regardless of it being deeply nested within NC in Glottolog). Güldemann has both Kru and Ubangi among his "promising" members or NC (on par with Dogon, Bangime and Pere). If we leave out Kru, we also have to leave out Ubangi, all the more since Dimmendaal considers Ubangi an isolate. –Austronesier (talk) 18:49, 23 May 2021 (UTC)