Talk:Life Safety Code
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||
![]() | Firefighting Mid‑importance | ||||||
|
Add a section for 2006 changes resulting from The Station fire, among others?
[edit]Like all consensus codes, the LSC is a living document. After the Station Nightclub fire, there were immediate changes made as temporary interim amendments, subsequently adopted in the 2006 code. Would it be useful to summarize some of the important changes for each version (2006, 2009, etc)? Lupinelawyer (talk) 18:40, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted flame ratings table
[edit]The "Current code" section contained a spurious table referenced to something well outside of the Life Safety Code and which appears nowhere in the code itself. NFPA 101 contains numerous references to OTHER codes for testing and rating materials but has no flame rating standards of its own.Lupinelawyer (talk) 00:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Life Safety Code. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928060024/http://www.nfpa.org/assets/images/NFPA101AdoptionMap.gif to http://www.nfpa.org/assets/images/NFPA101AdoptionMap.gif
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:04, 15 May 2017 (UTC)