Talk:List of British deception formations in World War II

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 3, 2022	WikiProject A-class review	Not approved

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

British Empire Low‑importance

	British Empire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European / World War II BL‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

BL

This article has been rated as BL-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Additional information:
/
	This article has failed an A-Class review.

What operation in northern Germany?

Can we clarify what operation the article is talking about that was to be undertaken near Kiel but cancelled?--EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 16:54, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete sentence

There seems to be some crucial words missing from this sentence about the 2nd Airborne Division: In the aftermath of Fortitude South, the notional 2nd Airborne Division, the notional United States 9th and 21st Airborne Divisions and the real United States 17th Airborne Divisions to depict an airborne threat to the Kiel-Bremen area in support of Operation Market Garden. Or at least I can't figure out what it's supposed to mean. Fornadan (t) 12:53, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

7th Division?

List of British Divisions in World War II#Deception mentions a 7th Division (Cyprus), which isn't listed here. Should it be, or is this an error? Andrew Gray (talk) 21:14, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

So is there any information about the effectiveness of these deceptive formations? Seeing how after the war the Allies had unlimited access to German military records, this information ought to be available. If it has been discussed in the secondary literature -- or there are insightful anecdotes in the published primary sources -- incorporating that material would make this article more useful. -- llywrch (talk) 18:44, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Llywrch: I noted that you commented while I was still in the process of overhauling the article into a list. I have added a background section that discusses, in part, what you were after. Largely the first draft at the moment, while I look at some other things. But hopefully, it goes towards addressing your concern.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 01:53, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]