Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Loving You No More

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleLoving You No More has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 5, 2011Good article nomineeListed
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconSongs
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
WikiProject iconR&B and Soul Music Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconElectronic music Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sean Garrett

[edit]

Sean Garrett wrote it... he has a demo of it

74.67.126.125 (talk) 23:06, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Loving You No More/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 16:00, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    There were a few minor errors, mainly to do with punctuation, which I have fixed.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Article is properly referenced.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
    Article complies to WP:OR.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Article complies to WP:NPOV.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Article is stable.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    All images check out.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    There were some minor errors which I have fixed. Everything else complies to the requirements for a GA, and I am pleased to pass this. Well done. – SMasters (talk) 16:44, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]