Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Majority government

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconPolitics Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconElections and Referendums
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.

Untitled

[edit]

"another example was the 2010-15 coalition government in the United Kingdom, as a sovereign state and to remain associated states such as England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland depending on the British status of nations which was composed of the Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties" this sentence makes absolutely no sense grammatically and factually.the individual UK constituent countries are irrelevant to the situation we had in the 2010-2015 as this coalition was in the UK parliament which has has jurisdiction for the whole UK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.96.14.189 (talk) 13:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Social majority minority and coalition

[edit]

another example was the 2010-15 coalition government in the United Kingdom, as a sovereign state and to remain associated states such as England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland depending on the British status of nations which was composed of the Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties" this sentence makes absolutely no sense grammatically and factually.the individual UK constituent countries are irrelevant to the situation we had in the 2010-2015 as this coalition was in the UK parliament which has has jurisdiction for the whole UK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.96.14.189 (talk) 13:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Last edited 3 years ago by AnomieBOT Wikipedia Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted. Privacy policy Terms of UseDesktop 2407:5200:300:4470:3D77:81CE:112D:BC76 (talk) 08:09, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sat Sri akal

[edit]

SAR JI SONU PTA HEE HOU PANJAB VICH KUCH JGAH TE THAND DA ALERT DITTA HE OH JGAH VICH SADDA PIND BEE AYA HE KIRPA KRKE PANJAB VICH CHUTTIYAN VDAUN DI KIRPALTA KRO WAHEGURU JI ❤️. YOU ARE BEST IN DA WORLD 106.217.187.49 (talk) 02:22, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

waheguru waheguru 106.217.187.49 (talk) 02:22, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]