Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Multiverse (DC Comics)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconComics: DC Comics Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by DC Comics work group.
WikiProject iconScience Fiction Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Krypton- 132? Krypton- 159?

[edit]

I read the Lois Lane/Supermaid story while a teenager. Given that that particular alternate world was destroyed when its sun went nova, wouldn't it be more appropriate to identify that alternate universe by its surviving Krypton, as Krypton- 159, given Jor-El's prevention of the cataclysmic chain reaction that destroyed it in other alternate universes?

For a similar reason, given that most of the action of that imaginary story alternate universe occurred on its intact Krypton, perhaps the alternate universe of Futuro could be designated Krypton- 132?

User: Calibanu 10.56, 01 May 2007

Post-52 Earth-One

[edit]

The article states that New Earth has been renamed Earth-1.


JLA 0 earth one found by flash

History / Pre-Crisis

[edit]

If it is of interest for addition to the article, there is a complete summary of the story in Wonder Woman #59 (1942) at http://www.comixfan.com/xfan/forums/showthread.php?t=43867

Ridiculously Small Map

[edit]

I assume the images you use to illustrate comic-book articles are of such poor quality because you're the only site on the entire internet that still worries about DC taking legal action if you use an image of Superman to illustrate a webpage about Superman, but is there really any point at all in illustrating an article about a fictional Multiverse with an extremely detailed map of the whole convoluted kaboodle reduced to such tiny dimensions that no details whatsoever are visible? You might as well have a photo of a kitten for all the use it would be. In fact, that would be an improvement, because at least your readers would be able to see what it was. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.52.132 (talk) 21:09, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Divine Continuum

[edit]

The "Divine Continuum" concept introduced in Flashpoint Beyond posits a parallel Space/Time structure to DC's multiple realities, with the Omniverse existing on the Space side and representing various conceptual frameworks for different worlds, but with Hypertime existing on the Time side and representing dynamic growth of realities as people make consequential decisions and the timeline splits as a result. It also groups previous Crises accordingly, with the Crisis on Infinite Earths, Infinite Crisis, Final Crisis, Multiversity, Dark Nights, and Dark Crisis being “Space Crises” dealing with the nature of the Multiverse; but with Zero Hour, The Kingdom, Flashpoint, Convergence, Doomsday Clock, and Flashpoint Beyond being “Time Crises” that alter the timeline.

Should the in-universe history of the Multiverse be restructured with this in mind, with two narratives presented corresponding to the Space and Time Crises? 2603:6010:900:2556:C469:409A:2DB7:F1C7 (talk) 09:47, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where are these concepts stated? We can not use primary sources to form our own interpretations. Dimadick (talk) 19:49, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]