Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Napoleon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This  level-3 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.WikiProject iconBiography: Military / Politics and Government / Royalty and Nobility / Core
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Top-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Top-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is listed on the project's core biographies page.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Biography / European / French / Napoleonic era
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military biography task force
Taskforce icon
European military history task force
Taskforce icon
French military history task force
Taskforce icon
Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)
WikiProject iconEuropean history Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEuropean Microstates: Andorra Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Andorra.
WikiProject iconFrance Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconItaly High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAfrica: Saint Helena Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Saint Helena work group (assessed as Top-importance).
WikiProject iconPolitics High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMalta Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Malta, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malta on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEgypt Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
          Other talk page banners
Section sizes
Section size for Napoleon (52 sections)
Section name Byte
count
Section
total
(Top) 16,412 16,412
Early life 7,322 7,322
Early career 18 18,583
Return to Corsica 2,657 2,657
Siege of Toulon 2,156 2,156
13 Vendémiaire 4,149 4,149
First Italian campaign 4,311 4,311
Egyptian expedition 5,292 5,292
Ruler of France 395 57,159
18 Brumaire 1,505 1,505
French Consulate 5,315 10,170
Temporary peace in Europe 4,855 4,855
French Empire 334 39,044
Bonaparte becomes Napoleon I 3,408 3,408
War of the Third Coalition 6,401 6,401
Middle-Eastern alliances 1,730 1,730
War of the Fourth Coalition and Tilsit 5,113 5,113
Peninsular War and Erfurt 5,436 5,436
War of the Fifth Coalition 3,362 3,362
Consolidation of the Empire 1,819 1,819
Invasion of Russia 5,059 5,059
War of the Sixth Coalition 6,382 6,382
Exile to Elba 1,988 1,988
Hundred Days 4,057 4,057
Exile on Saint Helena 7,509 11,436
Death 3,927 3,927
Religion 224 8,179
Religious beliefs 3,301 3,301
Concordat 2,089 2,089
Arrest of Pope Pius VII 1,045 1,045
Religious emancipation 1,520 1,520
Personality 6,863 6,863
Appearance and image 5,352 5,352
Reforms 1,272 11,508
Administration 2,231 2,231
Napoleonic Code 1,559 1,559
Warfare 3,272 3,272
Education 3,174 3,174
Memory and evaluation 55 15,933
Criticism 5,512 5,512
Propaganda and memory 5,197 5,197
Long-term influence outside France 5,169 5,169
Children 2,162 2,162
Titles 4,218 4,218
Notes 29 29
Citations 32 12,709
Works cited 55 12,677
Biographical studies 5,083 5,083
Historiography and memory 1,205 1,205
Specialty studies 6,334 6,334
Further reading 2,032 2,032
External links 6,308 6,308
Total 186,205 186,205


Infobox

[edit]

I really think we need to have another conversation about the family members in the infobox. It’d be good to have another talk about it with more editors involved. The “consensus” to remove valuable information from the infobox for no valid reason is being upheld by the same 2 or 3 editors, and those same few revert any edits that go against their “consensus.” I would give a detailed explanation as to why I think the family info removed should be restored but I’ve already done so in my previous conversation in the talk page, which went nowhere. I’m bringing it up again because I believe most editors would agree to restore the info, but perhaps aren’t aware of this discussion or aren’t passionate enough about it to create the conversation, I’m hoping more editors will get involved to change this ridiculous infobox. Kind regards, Robertus Pius (TalkContribs) 19:57, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is the information covered in other sections of the article, or only in the infobox? Dimadick (talk) 16:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’m speaking about the removal of Napoleons parents and children from the infobox. Those are key facts of Napoleon that should be included in the infobox. Robertus Pius (TalkContribs) 18:15, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree I think it's a bit unreasonable to exclude his parents and progeny from the Infobox, considering Napoleon's quite important for the late Bonaparte dynasty. I agree to to list his children and parents in the infobox. I know that Aemilius Adolphin prefered the minimalist approach, but I agree with Robertus, legend, Векочел, and others that it's quite important for the infobox. 128.62.179.178 (talk) 20:03, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’ve given up trying to change the infobox. Hopefully one day another editor will start up the conversation again as this infobox quite frankly, is ridiculous. Robertus Pius (TalkContribs) 23:22, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Robertus Pius: Consider opening an RfC. The overall appearance of the infobox of such a high profile figure cannot be decided by a handful of users. More insight is indeed required. Keivan.fTalk 15:44, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Keivan.f: I have thought of that. But I’ve never personally opened an Rfc before so I’d prefer another more experienced editor open the Rfc. I’d of course give my input, as I’ve done in many Rfc’s. Kind regards, Robertus Pius (TalkContribs) 16:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battlefield location

[edit]

battle of ligny 16 June 1815 missing on waterloo campaign map. Napoleon was in command. Trampled12 (talk) 20:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change to lead

[edit]

Hello all

I have changed the the following sentence in the lead: "Napoleon brought modernizing reforms to France and Western Europe, stimulating the development of nation states."To: Napoleon brought modernizing reforms to France and Western Europe, and the upheavals of the period stimulated the development of nation states." It wasn't the modernising reforms in themselves that stimulated the development of the nation states, it was a much more complicated amalgam of revolutionary ideas, the unintended consequences of his reoganisation of Europe and a result of his enemies using patriotism as a weapon of war against him. The last thing Napoleon wanted was a unified Germany on his border, an independent Italy, and a Battle of the Nations.

Happy to discuss Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 22:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A-Class

[edit]

If this article is a DGA, shouldn’t it go from A-class to B-class? 48JCL (talk) 18:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

because the A-class criteria is stricter than ga-class 48JCL (talk) 18:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this article was downgraded from GA it should be B class. Cinderella157 (talk) 23:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cinderella157 wdym? 48JCL (talk) 23:11, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this article is a DGA, it goes from A-class to B-class (unless the reassessment indicates it is not sufficient to meet B class). If it is no longer GA, it can no longer be A. I have made the adjustments in the banner to reflect B class. Cinderella157 (talk) 23:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ohhh thanks a lot! 48JCL (talk) 23:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent rewrite of lead

[edit]

Hello all

A couple of editors have extensively rewritten the lead, adding quite a lot of detail. I think it is generally better written than the previous version, but it tries to cram in too much detail and too many links leading to an almost unreadable sea of blue. I have cut some of the detail but I think it should be condensed much more in order to make it a high level summary of the main points of the article, rather than an attempt to rewrite the entire article in four paragraphs.

Happy to dicuss Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 06:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sfn style

[edit]

The article previously used a roughly 50-50 mix of {{sfn}} and {{sfnp}}. I have standardised the sfns on the latter following personal preference but have no objection changing them all to the former if there's a consensus for that instead – I just think that the style should be the same throughout. There are also one or two plain-text (non-templated) references to convert, which I will do shortly. Best, Wham2001 (talk) 20:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, but inevitably some of the sources are missing. If anybody can work out what the following sfns refer to:
  • Ref #270, Chandler (1995)
  • Ref #419, O'Connor (2003)
  • Ref #428, Flynn (2001)
please add the corresponding long-form source information to the bibliography (or fix the sfn, as appropriate). Thanks! Wham2001 (talk) 20:38, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Napoleon's Height

[edit]

There's been a myth that Napoleon's height was somewhere around 5'2, but in reality, he was just short of 5'6. Should we include that? Guythatupdatesrandomly (talk) 00:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This discussed in the section on "Appearance and Image". Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 00:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lapérouse expedition

[edit]

Just stumbled across the detail on the Lapérouse page that Napoleon came close to being offered a place on this expedition, which was lost in 1788, and would've had an immeasurable impact on the course of history if he had been gone with it.

This seems worth noting on his page too! The start of the 'Early career' section skips from his 1785 graduation to 1789 in one sentence, a single sentence detailing this near miss would be a valuable addition. 2601:445:800:13F0:69A4:15C2:A62A:606A (talk) 06:50, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is already a very long article in which many details have to be omitted. Napoleon wasn't offerred a position on the La Perouse expedition. Unfortunately, we don't have the space to record events that didn't happen. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 07:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]