Talk:New Hampshire

This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:United States: New Hampshire Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Top-importance).

Appalachia Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Appalachia, a collaborative effort to increase coverage of Appalachia and the Appalachian Mountains. If you would like to participate, go to the project page to see a list of related articles needing attention.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Section sizes

Section size for New Hampshire (48 sections) Section name Byte count Section total (Top) 16,392 16,392 History 6,063 6,063 Geography 11,751 20,527 Flora and fauna 578 578 Climate 5,987 5,987 Metropolitan areas 2,211 2,211 Demographics 972 24,865 Population 14,158 14,158 Birth data 4,268 4,268 Religion 5,467 5,467 Economy 8,706 11,228 Largest employers 2,522 2,522 Law and government 1,417 21,842 Governing documents 405 405 Branches of government 2,416 2,416 Local government 1,674 1,674 Politics 2,678 15,930 New Hampshire primary 3,505 3,505 Elections 6,753 6,753 Free State Project 2,994 2,994 Transportation 19 8,317 Highways 3,051 3,051 Air 592 592 Public transportation 4,253 4,253 Freight railways 402 402 Education 225 4,023 High schools 2,469 2,469 Colleges and universities 1,329 1,329 Media 10 3,273 Daily newspapers 836 836 Other publications 1,845 1,845 Radio stations 76 76 Television stations 506 506 Sports 3,757 3,757 Culture 3,071 6,181 In fiction 17 3,110 Theater 856 856 Comics 611 611 Television 1,626 1,626 Notable people 807 807 See also 103 103 Notes 24 24 References 29 29 Further reading 503 503 External links 64 2,217 State government 215 215 U.S. Government 592 592 Other 1,346 1,346 Total 130,151 130,151

Drug infested Den

I am from the UK.

Why did President Trump call New Hampshire a "drug infested den"? What does that mean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.224.32.138 (talk) 16:39, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

@87.224.32.138: "Drug infested" is a reference to the Opioid epidemic and "den" is a reference to an Opium den. See also the phrase "den of vice", among others. Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 04:10, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on New Hampshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101014112959/http://www.visitnh.gov/welcome-to-nh/state-facts.aspx to http://www.visitnh.gov/welcome-to-nh/state-facts.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100411025556/http://www.tolatsga.org/aben.html to http://tolatsga.org/aben.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0056/twps0056.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://blogs.saintanselmcollege.net/category/politics/face-the-nation/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.anselm.edu/news+and+events/college+news/news/2007-11-29-primarydebates.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

"New Hampshre" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect New Hampshre. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:44, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

"New Hampster" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect New Hampster. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:44, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

too much information in massive chart!

An editor just added a very large chart showing complete racial/ethnic and age breakdown of the five biggest cities/towns in the state - in my humble opinon that is WAY too detailed information for the general state article. If necessary it could be broken out into a separate article but it doesn't belong here, I'd say. Any thoughts? - 16:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidWBrooks (talk • contribs)

I understand your concern, DavidWBrooks. It's important to maintain the relevance and readability of Wikipedia articles. While detailed information can be valuable, it's essential to strike a balance. If this chart significantly detracts from the general state article's readability or overwhelms it with data, considering a separate article might be a reasonable suggestion. It's always a good practice to engage in constructive discussions and find a consensus within the Wikipedia community. What are the thoughts of others on this matter? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.96.13.213 (talk) 18:55, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

I think this data is fine where it is. It doesn't really impact the readability of the article. Garsh (talk) 23:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)