Talk:Nigel Clifford

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Chronological Order

This person seems to be self promoting himself, maybe do not need to be included in wikipedia! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.176.12.239 (talk) 09:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The positions held by this article are in a reverse order with some being slightly random. I plan to list all positions in forward chronological order starting with his earliest. Any objections? KayVee (talk) 12:18, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The subject of this article appears to rather trivial, and does not merit inclusion or listing in Wikipedia, or any encyclopedia, don't you think? Stevenmitchell (talk) 10:57, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It also appears that some of the contributions were either made by the subject himself or someone very close to him with a personal stake in his inclusion in Wikipedia... Stevenmitchell (talk) 10:57, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re-order to chronological seems...logical. Subject does merit inclusion (IMHO) as current CEO of an organisation with significant cultural and historical significance.--JonathanElder (talk) 15:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]