Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Nixon v. Herndon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconU.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconLaw Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCivil Rights Movement Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil Rights Movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil Rights Movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
To-do list for Nixon v. Herndon:
No to-do list assigned.
WikiProject Civil Rights Movement to do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconUnited States: Texas Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Texas.
WikiProject iconAfrican diaspora Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nixon v. Herndon

[edit]

Texas was never a one-party state contrary to your edit here in Nixon v. Herndon [1]. The Republican party in Texas goes back to 1867 and between 1896 and 1950, three Republicans were elected to Congress from the state. One of whom, Harry Wurzbach, served for approximately a decade....William 21:08, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Republican Party may have started in 1867, but after Reconstruction, the University of Texas says that the Democratic Party dominated. In 1901 the legislature passed a poll tax, which caused a decline in voting by poor minorities and whites. <<By the early 20th century, the Democratic Party in Texas started using a "white primary," which the state legislature authorized in 1923.("Historical Barriers to Voting", in Texas Politics, University of Texas: url=http://texaspolitics.laits.utexas.edu/html/vce/0503.html//archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080402060131/http://texaspolitics.laits.utexas.edu/html/vce/0503.html) Since the Democratic Party dominated the state after 1900 for decades, the "white primary" provision reduced what little minority participation there was as the primaries were the true competitive contest. These provisions extended deep into the 20th century.("Barriers to Voting") >> When the primary is the effective contest, it is essentially a one-party state.Parkwells (talk) 22:31, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If the author makes that conclusion, quote the portions of the author's text saying so and add it to the citation. It also defuses accusations of original research synthesis WhisperToMe (talk) 21:27, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]