Talk:Nuclear weapon

This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Military history: Technology / Weaponry

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force

Physics High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Engineering High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment High‑importance

	This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Policy High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Policy Analysis

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 March 2022 and 30 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lesotelo1218 (article contribs).

Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MatthieuFoucu (article contribs). Peer reviewers: VAV1210, TheEditor0702.

— Assignment last updated by Thecanyon (talk) 05:33, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 October 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Onichae (talk) 09:42, 25 October 2023 (UTC) add Oppenheimer and that he created the nuke

•  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Also, Oppenheimer is already mentioned three times in the article, including being described as the "father of the atomic bomb". --AntiDionysius (talk) 09:48, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Which english?

It should be stated at the top of this talk page which english type this article is written in please Iljhgtn (talk) 00:40, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Creation

Add more relevance in the role that several other scientists had in the creation for example, Oppenheimer, Einstein, etc. QSpangenburg6 (talk) 15:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)