Talk:Numbered Air Force

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force North American military history task force United States military history task force

It is more of an article with a list than just a list. --Pmsyyz 02:47, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Numbering of subordinate units

I don't understand this sentence: "Units directly subordinate to a NAF are generally numbered 6XX (where XX is the NAF number)." So if a NAF has two units directly subordinate to it, then they would both have the same number (6XX)? That doesn't seem to make any sense to me. The cited source no longer exists, so I can't verify this statement. Anyone have any idea? 74.71.93.111 (talk) 05:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

O-G

I tried to translate "operationally-gained" into standard English. This looks like a technical term, which would be unknown to readers not versed in the bureaucratic nuances of the United Sates Air Force. If it is important enough to be in this article, then its definition should be used here. I made a stab at doing that. Nick Beeson (talk) 09:47, 14 April 2017 (UTC)