Talk:Omo River

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ethiopia portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ethiopia (assessed as High-importance).

Rivers Mid‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

I'm increasing the importance rating for this article from "Mid" to "High" due to the UNESCO World Heritage classification. -- llywrch 20:01, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Under the heading "Human Impact", a sentence begins " Fossils belonging to the genera Australopithecine and Homo ..." Australopithecine should read Australopithecus. I didn't change this because I didn't know how to revise the link. Mathyeti (talk) 22:43, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 7 February 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Za wl 16:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Omo River (Ethiopia) → Omo River – The Ethiopian river is clearly the main topic per WP:Primary topic and the fact that the river is a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The article has been moved to the current disambiguated title when a new article on a river in Quebec was created in December 2017. - Darwinek (talk) 19:28, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support as nom. - Darwinek (talk) 19:28, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support. WP:TWODABS page with a clear primary topic both in terms of historical significance and by pageviews (the river in Ethiopia gets 98% of the traffic. bd2412 T 15:54, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Clear primary topic. kennethaw88 • talk 23:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support. 760 vs 60 km in terms of length shows this one is primary...Jokulhlaup (talk) 09:36, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Omo (Not Bottego)

Wikipedia should not give credit to some one who christines a river that is full of history with his own name after visiting it. This is a sickening attitude. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.71.6.201 (talk) 09:38, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]