Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconMicronesia: Johnston Atoll / Wake Island Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Micronesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Micronesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article is supported by the Johnston Atoll work group (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Wake Island work group (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconProtected areas Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Are all of these islands from the "Guano Islands Act"? Reddwarf2956 (talk) 15:23, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See Also[edit]

How does an island in the Caribbean relate to the middle of the Pacific? --Belg4mit 23:31, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Navassa (in the Caribbean) is governed under the same rules as these cluster of islands. They are also US insular areas. They were also formerly governed by the military (except for Baker, Howland, Jarvis). In summary, there is a lot in common. - Thanks, Hoshie 00:38, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Seems pretty tenuous, by your logic Vieques is also relevant. --Belg4mit 20:05, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
One more point. These islands and Navassa are uninhabited. Because of this, Vieques does not fit into this. - Thanks, Hoshie 01:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rm. map[edit]

Commented out the map, as it has Midway instead of Wake per the CIA. Our articles and other sources contradict this. — kwami (talk) 21:47, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]