Talk:Periodismo para todos
 | A fact from Periodismo para todos appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 August 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
| This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Periodismo para todos, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list. | |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
| This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
DYK nomination[edit]
Added "Too Few Opinions Tag"[edit]
After pointing out that the show is also considered yellow journalism in addition to investigative reporting, I added this tag because more is needed about this aspect of the program. Sushilover2000 (talk) 01:00, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Rolling Stone[edit]
Rolling Stone is a news magazine and a valid reference. Sushilover2000 (talk) 05:53, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Rolling Stone is a music magazine. It is a valid reference... for the articles about Fito Páez or Charly García. Their opinion of political TV programs is irrelevant Cambalachero (talk) 13:05, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Rolling Stone covers lots of topics from Music to Politics. Certainly, an opinion about a TV show (=entertainment) is within their relevant expertise. I re-added the "Too Few Opinions Tag" again after you removed it. Sushilover2000 (talk) 20:52, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- It's still a music magazine, and their opinion on political topics has very little significance. Can you mention a source specialized in political information, without a conflict of interest with either the program or the government, that says the same thing? Cambalachero (talk) 01:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- I refer you to Wikipedia's page on Rolling Stone: "Rolling Stone is a magazine published every two weeks that focuses on politics and popular culture". Clearly, a TV show such as PPT is within their expertise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushilover2000 (talk • contribs) 08:15, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Again: Can you mention a source specialized in political information, without a conflict of interest with either the program or the government, that says the same thing? Cambalachero (talk) 00:26, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- I refer you to Wikipedia's page on Rolling Stone: "Rolling Stone is a magazine published every two weeks that focuses on politics and popular culture". Clearly, a TV show such as PPT is within their expertise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushilover2000 (talk • contribs) 08:15, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- It's still a music magazine, and their opinion on political topics has very little significance. Can you mention a source specialized in political information, without a conflict of interest with either the program or the government, that says the same thing? Cambalachero (talk) 01:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Rolling Stone covers lots of topics from Music to Politics. Certainly, an opinion about a TV show (=entertainment) is within their relevant expertise. I re-added the "Too Few Opinions Tag" again after you removed it. Sushilover2000 (talk) 20:52, 15 December 2013 (UTC)