Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Pope Paul III

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconEuropean Microstates: Vatican City Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Vatican City (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconChristianity Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCatholicism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconPope Paul III is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Antichrist?

[edit]

In the Smalcald articles, protestant leader Martin Luther declared that "the Pope is the very antichrist." Luther died in 1546. I suppose that means we're all safe, since Paul III (who reigned at the time Luther wrote this) has been dead for 462 years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.23.86.169 (talkcontribs)

Untitled

[edit]

Am I the only one that thinks this page needs to be cleaned up a bit? Like separating the various parts of life and all...--Elsan 20:55, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There are also several grammar issues that need fixing. I'm not sure about all of them being wrong but some things are worded awkwardly and confused me.

Re-write needed

[edit]

This article is obviously cut and paste from an early 20-th century source. If anyone wants to take it up, a very good article could be created from more modern sources. PiCo 02:57, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than replacing 20th-century sources influenced by 20th-century interests by 21st-century sources influenced by 21st century interests, why not quote somewhere the whole (translated) contents of the original bill, like some European wikipedias (for instance fr:Veritas ipsa) already do ? No more copyright applies to these documents now. 82.226.27.88 (talk) 15:28, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Latin original citation needed

[edit]

"The right of inhabitants of Rome to publicly buy and sell slaves of both sexes was affirmed"

One can wonder if this quoted opinion is founded, because all acts were in latin and the very same word servus means in latin servant as well as slave, so it seems unclear. Of course, the transfer of a good servant would be negociated, just as the transfer of a good football player nowadays : any good contract, even nowadays, has its escape clauses. 82.226.27.88 (talk) 15:22, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pope Paul III. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:51, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]