Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Portuguese Inquisition

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconReligion: Interfaith High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.
WikiProject iconJudaism Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCatholicism B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconPortuguese Inquisition is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.
BThis article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconPortugal High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

  • Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
  • Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

Assess

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Removal

[edit]

I removed the folling from the lead section:

In a time of enmity betwixt Catholics and Protestants, Catholic Portugal and Protestant England were allies, and both were enemies of Spain, so the bloody Portuguese Inquisition is less notorious than that of Spain because the English wrote history at that time.

Anyone care to provide references for it being "less notorious" (because "the English wrote history" or otherwise)? -- ALoan (Talk) 18:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the following paragraph for lack of reliable reference:

In Portugal, the inquisitors excommunicated King João IV in 1656, after his death. The king's corpse was pulled from his coffin as it lay in the cathedral, undressed, and cast on the ground. After excommunicating the cadaver, the inquisitiors pronounced absolution, had the corpse replaced in the coffin, and left.

Propose for Removal

[edit]

Why is Lamego in the Table of Sentences, if there are 0 sentences across all time periods ? It should be removed. I'm having some issues with the login, so I'll leave it for someone else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.140.133.56 (talk) 15:46, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Any source for this quote?

[edit]

Is there any backing for a statement such as the below (it doesn't strike me as accurate, as the Inquisition was against converts not other religious groups):

The Goa Inquisition, another campaign rife with antisemitism and anti-Hinduism predictably targeted Jews and Hindus. It was established in Goa in 1560 by Aleixo Dias Falcão and Francisco Marques, who occupied the palace of the Sabaio Adil Khan. --fredericknoronha (talk) 21:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

History - Nitpick "auto de fé"; surely "auto da fé"

[edit]

History third paragraph, ? "auto de fé"; surely "auto da fé"

May I leave that with someone better versed on 16thC Portuguese?

BLaChenal (talk) 20:22, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. And also some other tweaks (basically links). The Ogre (talk) 09:22, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Please don't do it again. Leave it to someone better versed in Portuguese. Modern Portuguese basic language skills will do, no need for a "16thC Portuguese" expert. This a very common mistake on Wikipedia of users (english speaking one's) confused about the basic rules of contractio of articles ("o" "a" "um" "uma") and prepositions ("de" ,"por" etc.)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Portuguese Inquisition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:37, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]