Talk:Renaissance

This  level-3 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.European history Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Social and political / Medieval High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces: /  Social and political philosophy Medieval philosophy

Spoken Wikipedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Section sizes

Section size for Renaissance (41 sections) Section name Byte count Section total (Top) 5,162 5,162 Period 6,452 6,452 Overview 6,624 6,624 Origins 1,730 17,941 Latin and Greek phases of Renaissance humanism 4,728 4,728 Social and political structures in Italy 4,727 4,727 Black Death 4,442 4,442 Cultural conditions in Florence 2,314 2,314 Characteristics 20 28,515 Humanism 4,597 4,597 Humanism and libraries 1,371 1,371 Art 5,609 5,609 Science 6,615 6,615 Navigation and geography 2,270 2,270 Music 851 851 Religion 3,901 3,901 Self-awareness 3,281 3,281 Spread 461 33,931 England 3,762 3,762 France 1,991 1,991 Germany 1,224 1,224 Hungarian trecento and quattrocento 7,904 7,904 Renaissance in the Low Countries 1,470 1,470 Northern Europe 4,228 4,228 Poland 5,547 5,547 Portugal 5,328 5,328 Spain 1,930 1,930 Further countries 86 86 Historiography 20 11,432 Conception 4,255 4,255 Debates about progress 7,157 7,157 Other Renaissances 1,498 1,498 See also 229 229 References 15 2,256 Explanatory notes 45 45 Citations 31 31 General sources 2,165 2,165 Further reading 3,711 5,755 Historiography 1,737 1,737 Primary sources 307 307 External links 1,198 1,198 Total 120,993 120,993

GA Reassessment

Renaissance

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Delisted per consensus. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 08:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

GA from 2007. Significant unsourced material including entire unsourced sections throughout the article. I had placed comments before hand back in February stating that this would need to be fixed or i'd nominate it to be delisted and the issues still remain. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

I agree: there are just too many unreferenced paragraphs. Phlsph7 (talk) 07:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Yeesh. Yes. It's in a pretty bad state. Getting this back to GA will be a real project. Iskandar323 (talk) 09:00, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Delist - lots of effort needed to get this to GA standard. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 16:15, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.