Talk:Richard Pace
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||
Biography | ||||
|
WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | This article is within the scope of||
Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | This article is within the scope of||
Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | This article is within the scope of||
Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Low-importance). |
Requested move 7 September 2020
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
– No indication that the 500-year-old activities of the diplomat hold sufficient historical import for primary status. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 07:24, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. Although the settler's article is longer, the diplomat does appear to have the most historical significance by quite a long way. The only other two real people with articles were really notable to their local area only, whereas the diplomat was a figure of national and international importance. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:51, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Due to lack of a rationale provided in the nomination. There is no such thing as "sufficient historical import for primary status," as primary topics are determined relative to other subjects of the same name and not some arbitrary bar of historical importance.--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:05, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Start-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class England-related articles
- Low-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages
- Start-Class London-related articles
- Low-importance London-related articles
- Start-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- Start-Class Anglicanism articles
- Low-importance Anglicanism articles
- WikiProject Anglicanism articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles